 Letter to the Editor (local Berkshire news):
GBFD’S MESSAGE IS INACCURATE AND MISPLACED Great Barrington is one of the few MA towns that has not exercised statutory rights to acquire its independent water companies. For the sake of sustaining our water supply, we need to change the lack of public governance. That is the purpose of our two petitions that needs your vote on Thursday, April 17, at the 6 pm Special Town Meeting (STM). Forming a water enterprise fund will ensure that only water users will pay for the acquisition, upgrades and usage costs for their own system. NO ONE PAYS TWICE. This is the principle of our wastewater facility. Its expensive renovation was supported by grants, government loans, and the enterprise fund. We can take a lesson from our neighbor, South Egremont, which re-acquired its water rights from the same Mercer family in 1996. Wisely, the town had created an enterprise fund beforehand because that way, only 200 rate payers would be billed for these water system upgrades in a town of 1,000 people. Businesses in town center knew how critical clean water was. Regarding Egremont’s acquisition as reported in the Eagle, “…if the company declines the offer, voters…authorized the town to apply to the state Supreme Judicial Court to determine the appropriate price.” This sure-fire provision is contained in Egremont’s State Statute and is identical to GB’s which we should use as a backstop. Over 100 such statutes are documented in the DPU’s compendium of water statutes. Funding for Egremont was accessed by grants; water users; and loans from the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) at 0 to 2% rates and 20 to 40 year terms. As an example, the State granted 50% or $2.4 million of Egremont’s pipe replacement costs for its Main Street renovation. Contrary to idealists, the state does not guarantee loans until the Town owns the entity, so the Town must take these first steps. The projected expenses to upgrade GBFD’s system is on the same order as HWW’s. GBFD received approval of $5 million for its capital plan at its Annual Meeting (with a quorum of 15 voters). In HWW’s DPU settlement was approved for raising slightly less capital, but payback was shorter and interest rate higher (7%). Long term, both require 40-year pipe replacement/repair plans as documented in the DPC Engineering report. So there is no avoiding high costs for water system upgrades. To quote the GBFD’s fear-mongering letter that states: “If votes to purchase the Housatonic Water Company and the GBFD pass, customers of the Fire District and HWW and all taxpayers will be supporting twice the operating costs, along with the costs for infrastructure upgrades” is simply untrue. Non-users of water systems (those on wells) will not be paying any water system costs, whether under the new or old GBFD or HWW. This year, GBFD levied $1.50 per $1,000 onto its users, that is 10% on top of our real estate taxes to support its $5 million capital plan without a peep from its water users. That amounts to doubling the annual cost of water for most GBFD customers. And, this is with or without an acquisition. If acquired, HWW users would actually pay less because it would be eligible for the low interest State Revolving Funds for water system upgrades. In the DPU filing regarding the HWW rate settlement, Stockbridge calculated the DPU settlement rates would be reduced for the average rate payer by $660 annually if financed through a low interest, 20 year loan. These loans are not available to private water companies in MA according to U.S. Rep. Richard Neal. GBFD was granted special privileges due to the State ensuring the early viability of its water system 100 years ago. Many early water systems had failed. GBFD is still using these Town privileges for its tax billing and collection and has special access to DWSRF loans. But this should not be confused with being under town governance. Prominent citizens have called for the abolition of GBFD for decades calling it “obsolete.” In 2022, our Town could not convince GBFD to acquire or manage HWW because it was beyond GBFD’s power and financial charter. To do so, GBFD must be acquired first by the Town, the reason for the second motion. Excess overhead: We have two fire houses, but one fire chief, two libraries, but one library director. It’s high time we leverage our precious water resources to plan, oversee and optimize our resources and costs. Our organizational fragmentation does not address a way to plan for our short or long-term water needs. For a start, please vote “Yes” on both motions on April 17. We need a 2/3 majority to send a message to our select board. Sharon Gregory Great Barrington
0 Comments
Letter to the editor by Andrew Berens, Housatonic, published in the Berkshire Eagle on Nov. 15, 2023.  Housatonic Water Works (HWW) has proposed a multimillion-dollar fix at the village’s expense for one aspect of the village’s water woes: turbid colored water.
A HWW-commissioned study by Cornwell Engineering Group implicates elevated manganese levels as the genesis of this problem, and the company has a rate increase petition to pass these costs onto the citizens. ("Housatonic residents say they should not have to pay to fix the water. They asked regulators to scour company finances," Eagle, Sept. 27.) While the village is desperate for improvements in the water quality, I believe there are a number of discrepancies in the methodologies and conclusions of this report linking manganese levels and water color problems that warrant, at the very least, an objective, independently commissioned review by a third party. Understanding the true cause of the water woes might require a repeat study, especially given some of the concerns about data collection integrity and consistency, before implementing the proposed solutions to lower manganese levels at the village’s expense.  Banners last summer calling for Housatonic Water Works Co. customers to withhold payments over water quality issues were one form of protest over drinking water issues. Amid the company's request for a rate hike, residents are circulating a petition urging state regulators to reject allowing the increase in water bills. EAGLE FILE PHOTO By Heather Bellow, The Berkshire Eagle
Sep 23, 2023 Banners last summer calling for Housatonic Water Works Co. customers to withhold payments over water quality issues were one form of protest over drinking water issues. Amid the company's request for a rate hike, residents are circulating a petition urging state regulators to reject allowing the increase in water bills. Hi Heather,
Thank you for the work that you have been doing covering Housatonic's water issues. We really appreciate it. One small thing I wanted to point out though. We only stopped paying our bill specifically because the town water is not meeting legal safety standards. We are very upset about the terrible water quality and service in general of course, but we only decided to stop paying when the legal safety standards were repeatedly breached and unresolved after so long. Being forced to pay for a "product" in the USA that does not meet legal safety standards that you cannot live without and cannot get elsewhere (a monopoly) is just wrong on every level. Once the HAA5 falls back down to what is considered legally safe (even though we may not personally agree with that level), we will start paying our bill once again, even if the other water issues continue. |
RSS Feed